Little girl by chair


Two of the types of photo that are difficult to get balanced in terms of light and shade are ones printed on textured paper and ones in which very pale colours or white form the main part of the content. The latter is one of the reasons that photographs should not be scanned with any of the scanner’s automatic filters on (most scanners have a ‘professional’ or similar setting in which these auto-features can be turned off, but the default settings are usually with them on), as too much brightness can wash out most of the detail in light areas (such as lace, or slight shadows in a blouse that show its shape) and too much shadow can similarly knock out detail in darkened areas.

The photo above – which is on textured paper – was shot in a normal studio setting but the surround was then deliberately washed-out by the printer, and the child is wearing a pale dress with white socks. Added to that, while the quality of the print isn’t bad, it is a bit faded and needed more contrast between the shadows and mid-tones, without affecting the highlights too much. That posed a problem because using my usual techniques on this photo would have darkened the child’s face too much.

So I decided to remove the colour from the background, do a slight tint on the dress, socks and shoes, bracelet-chain and chair, and then colour the child’s skin, eyes, lips and hair. Then, apart from ensuring that there was enough balance between the tonalities, I left the rest of it alone.Β  As usual, I’ve avoided adding extra colour to the cheeks. If you haven’t already, you can read my reasoning in my post Little Roselyne.

I picked out some of the detail in the dress by adding extra white. I had wondered about adding extra colour to the flowers – perhaps some pink or peach – but decided it might be overdoing it.

The dress is not a pure white – if you look at it (click on the images a couple of times to see it larger, it’ll open in a separate window or tab) you’ll see it’s actually two or more layers of fabric – embroidery on a translucent fabric with broad lace edgings plus one or two more fabrics beneath those. The petticoat looks to me like it might be crochet or broderie anglaise. Maybe someone more knowledgeable about fabrics could tell me?

I do note that the embroidery includes the traditional cabbage-roses that have been around as part of fabric designs for a very long time.

On the back of the card is the name of the photographer:

T. Taylor, 77 Standish Street, Burnley. I had a look online and this photographer is mentioned a few times. One person refers to his family having had photos taken there between the 1930s and 1950s, but most of the entries date him in the 1930s, so I’ll assume this child is from that sort of period, possibly a bit later.

77 Standish Street now seems to be the site of Mama Jo’s (look like a takeaway food place). Click, drag and zoom inside the Google Maps streetview image to navigate inside it:

Aside from all that – isn’t she a sweet little girl? I wish I knew who she was, or, if she’s still going strong, who she is.

31 thoughts on “Little girl by chair

  1. She is sweet. Her posture seems to say, “I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be doing, but I want to please.” I particularly like the celadon-like shades. It’s one of my favorite greens — that almost-there-but-not-quite shade that’s almost exotic, like a fine glazed Chinese teapot.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ah, I hadn’t known the name ‘celadon’ (had to look it up) but I know what you mean. This colour is something I had a round a lot when I was growing up, the chair particularly is in a shade that my mother seemed to paint everything she could find! And our house abounded with vases i this sort of colour, too. Thanks, Linda.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Well, you looked up “celadon” which I knew, because we have some people in the family who’ve done ceramics, but I had to look up “broderie anglaise” – – clothing and fabric have a ton of technical terms. You did a great job on this photo, it looks great.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. While it’s older than that, broderie anglaise was very popular in the UK in the 1950s and 1960s so I saw a lot of it. It tends to be fairly thin, though (cotton – usually bleached white) so I’m not certain that this child is wearing it, it’s just that some looks similar.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. The research is seemingly never ending, don’t you find? You must have discovered so much about your family – I’m looking forward to reading more in your blog (and maybe, one day in the future, buying your book). I love the research I do for each photo – not just the ones I do for myself that find themselves on this blog, but the ones I do for other people as well. For me, it’s a continuing and surprising education, taking me into areas I probably wouldn’t have investigated without the impetus of each photo. Thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

Pleasant comments welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s